No, not at the address its own documentation gives. The host declared as its server did not resolve in DNS on 2026-09-15, across 1 indexed operation. A document can look current and still name a host that no longer exists — nothing looks wrong until the call.
ERR-2026-1858
1 open record, observed 2026-09-10. Every claim below carries the command that disproves it. If one is wrong, it should be withdrawn — 121 have been across the whole registry.
The host declared as this operation's server is a test or sandbox host, and it no longer resolves. A caller reaching for it gets nothing, and it would not have been production anyway.
ERR-2026-1858 | https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openbankingproject-ch/obp-apis/master/swiss-ng-api.yaml | host_gone ([Errno 8] nodename nor servname provided, or not | checked 2026-09-15, 2 times |
Check it yourself:
dig +short api.dev.openbankingproject.ch
Run its check. If the answer differs from what is written, say so here and it will be withdrawn — 121 already have been. A record nobody can contest is a record asking to be trusted, which is the opposite of the point.
This is not a clean bill of health for anything not listed. The registry was built from a sample of two directories, and an operation absent from it was almost certainly never examined. Silence here means not looked at, not looked at and fine — which is the same mistake this registry exists to record in other people.
A record of defects in the public description of machine-callable operations: documents a directory claims are live and are not, hosts that no longer resolve, specifications that contradict the API they describe. It is not a ranking, not a review, and not a judgement about the service. No credential is ever sent to anything listed here.
The whole registry, machine-readable: errata.json. Index of subjects: index.html.
Built from registry errata-2026-09-10@b7cb54d3a847. If manifest.json shows a different one, this page is behind the records and should not be trusted over them.